جمعرات، 9 جولائی 2026
صفحہ اول 🔍 تلاش ہمارے بارے میں رابطہ
General

What a Safety Net is Actually for: Lessons From Bangladesh and Akhuwat

سیفٹی نیٹ دراصل اس کے لیے کیا ہے: بنگلہ دیش اور اخوت سے اسباق

What a Safety Net is Actually for: Lessons From Bangladesh and Akhuwat

Pakistan s BISP shows what a poverty program looks like when its accounting collapses faster than its caseload grows. But BISP was never short on precedent for the opposite: two models sitting right next door — one across the eastern border, one across town in Lahore — forged their design around a question BISP s audits keep exposing gaps in: what

Pakistan s BISP shows what a poverty effort looks like when its accounting collapses faster than its caseload grows. But BISP was never short on precedent for the opposite: two models sitting right next door — one across the eastern border, one across town in Lahore — built their design around a question BISP s audits keep exposing gaps in: what is a safety net actually supposed to do, and how do you keep it honest at scale? The news comes at a time of heightened scrutiny on the issue.

The Broader Picture

Understanding what led to this point requires a closer examination of the circumstances involved.

Bangladesh s poverty architecture and Pakistan s own Akhuwat Foundation were built to do the latter — and each started from a specific, stated proposal about why the poor stay poor, not just a delivery mechanism.

Bangladesh s Sprawl, By the Numbers Bangladesh s safety net began in the wake of 1971 as food relief for a war-shattered country, then deliberately shifted toward cash transfers and graduation ladders meant to build income-generating capacity rather than permanent dependency — the proposal being that relief alone traps people, and skills plus assets don t. In practice, the system shares BISP s habit of disagreeing with itself on the count: government tallies cite anywhere from roughly 115 overlapping programmes ( FY2023-24) to about 140 — the number the FY2025-26 budget is trying to shrink to under 100 by merging schemes, while raising the allocation over 12 % to more than Tk 95,900 crore.

Significantly, the results are authentic: a World Bank assessment from late November 2025 found Bangladesh lifted roughly 34 million people out of poverty between 2010 and 2022, extreme poverty falling from 12.2 % to 5.6 %.

Expert Analysis

The response from officials, analysts, and stakeholders has been swift and pointed.

Grameen Bank: Credit Instead of a Stipend Muhammad Yunus s founding proposal, in 1976, was that poverty wasn t a personal failing but a failure of access — the poor weren t uncreditworthy, conventional banks simply refused to lend to them without collateral they didn t have.

At the same time, instead of a stipend, it offers capital: a cumulative $ 42.1 billion disbursed to 10.6 million borrowers, 97 % women, across 94 % of Bangladesh s villages, with recovery holding around 95-96 %.

Significantly, bRAC s Graduation Model: An Exit Ramp, Not a Stipend BRAC s proposal in 2002 was narrower and more specific: some households are too poor even for microcredit to reach, and what they need isn t a loan or a stipend but a bundled, time-bound push — an asset, training, and coaching — that ends on a fixed schedule rather than continuing indefinitely.

Impact on Americans

This development is likely to influence decisions and discussions in the weeks ahead.

BRAC s 2025 annual report puts cumulative reach at over 2.3 million Bangladeshi households graduated out of extreme poverty, with independent studies finding 95 % still out at programme end and the gains holding for up to a decade for most.

What has become increasingly clear is that akhuwat: Zero Interest, Mosque-Based, Community-Enforced Akhuwat, founded in Lahore in 2001 by previous civil servant Dr. Amjad Saqib, rests on the Islamic principle of Mawakhat, or brotherhood: the proposal that lending should restore a borrower s dignity rather than create dependency, and that interest — not a lack of charity — is what traps the poor in debt.

Adding further dimension to the story, same Purpose, Different Machinery None of this is a case for microfinance as a cure-all — Grameen s recovery isn t perfect, Bangladesh still misdirects coverage at scale, and debt-trap critiques of microcredit are well documented.

Observers have also noted that but the throughline holds: each of these programs started with an explicit theory of why the poor stay poor, then built fraud resistance and purpose into the same mechanism — peer guarantee instead of a database check, a fixed exit instead of an open-ended stipend.

Observers have also noted that it has one, operating a few hundred kilometers

Looking Ahead

The developments detailed here represent only the latest chapter in an ongoing story. As more information becomes available, the full picture is expected to come into sharper focus for those following the situation.

🔒
Stay Safe Online — NordVPN Protect your privacy & browse securely. Trusted by millions worldwide. Special deal available.
Get NordVPN →

💬 Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Leave a Comment

ℹ️ Comments are moderated and will appear after approval.