Fox News contributor Tyrus and the ‘ Gutfeld! ’ panel discuss the latest failed attempt to pass a congressional insider stock trading ban. They debate the constitutional questions surrounding the legislation and the Voter ID requirement attached to it.
Fox News contributor Tyrus and the ‘ Gutfeld! ’ panel discuss the latest failed attempt to pass a congressional insider stock trading ban. They debate the constitutional questions surrounding the legislation and the Voter ID requirement attached to it.
Fox News contributor Tyrus and the ‘ Gutfeld! ’ panel discuss the latest failed attempt to pass a congressional insider stock trading ban. They debate the constitutional questions surrounding the legislation and the Voter ID requirement attached to it. The development underscores the growing complexity of the situation.
Context and History
Tracing the events that led here provides important context for what follows.
Americans do not agree on much these days, but they certainly agree on this: Members of Congress should not get rich trading stocks while writing the very laws that move those stocks.
The failure to ban insider trading in Congress is part of a broader rot now engulfing the swamp.
Compounding the significance of these events, to these voters, corruption, and corrupt acts like insider trading, are even more important than the cost of groceries and gas.
Reactions and Responses
The implications of this development are already being assessed by those closest to the issue.
Despite a slew of arrests in Minnesota, California and New York, where well-connected liberal groups and activists were caught stealing billions in taxpayer dollars, Democrats hold a four-point edge, 35 % to 31 %, on which party would better handle political corruption.
Further developments have shed additional light on the matter. of those surveyed by CNBC, 93 % said members of Congress and the president should not own or trade stock in companies that hold federal contracts, and 89 % said companies owned by a sitting president ’ s immediate family should not receive federal contracts at all.
In a detail that has not gone unnoticed, ( Gif/CNN) DOZENS OF HOUSE DEMOCRATS REJECT BILL FUSING CONGRESSIONAL STOCK BAN WITH FEDERAL VOTER ID But apparently, it isn ’ t reasonable for Democrats.
Policy Implications
Beyond the immediate headlines, this development could reshape how the issue is handled.
On Sept. 30, Senate Democrats rejected the Stop Insider Trading Act after it had already passed the House with Democratic votes.
Compounding the significance of these events, if it had passed, the law would have barred members of Congress, their spouses and their dependent children from buying new stock in public companies even as in office.
It has also emerged that even more to the point: Democrats ran the Senate for years and never delivered the `` real'' ban on insider trading they now disingenuously purport to want.
Of particular significance is the fact that senate Democrats ’ latest vote against the Stop Insider Trading Act also puts attention back on Nancy Pelosi ’ s household, which sold 2,000 shares of Visa, worth between $ 500,000 and $ 1 million, on July 1, 2024.
Adding to the complexity of the situation, i might sum up the whole thing by saying: ‘ I ’ ve seen my opportunities and I took ‘ em. ’'' Today, Pelosi ’ s corruption is so obvious th
The Road Ahead
What is clear is that this story is not yet over. The coming days and weeks will likely bring additional developments — and additional clarity — on a situation that has already captured significant national attention.
Fox News contributor Tyrus and the ‘ Gutfeld! ’ panel discuss the latest failed attempt to pass a congressional insider stock trading ban. They debate the constitutional questions surrounding the legislation and the Voter ID requirement attached to it. The development underscores the growing complexity of the situation.
Context and History
Tracing the events that led here provides important context for what follows.
Americans do not agree on much these days, but they certainly agree on this: Members of Congress should not get rich trading stocks while writing the very laws that move those stocks.
The failure to ban insider trading in Congress is part of a broader rot now engulfing the swamp.
Compounding the significance of these events, to these voters, corruption, and corrupt acts like insider trading, are even more important than the cost of groceries and gas.
Reactions and Responses
The implications of this development are already being assessed by those closest to the issue.
Despite a slew of arrests in Minnesota, California and New York, where well-connected liberal groups and activists were caught stealing billions in taxpayer dollars, Democrats hold a four-point edge, 35 % to 31 %, on which party would better handle political corruption.
Further developments have shed additional light on the matter. of those surveyed by CNBC, 93 % said members of Congress and the president should not own or trade stock in companies that hold federal contracts, and 89 % said companies owned by a sitting president ’ s immediate family should not receive federal contracts at all.
In a detail that has not gone unnoticed, ( Gif/CNN) DOZENS OF HOUSE DEMOCRATS REJECT BILL FUSING CONGRESSIONAL STOCK BAN WITH FEDERAL VOTER ID But apparently, it isn ’ t reasonable for Democrats.
Policy Implications
Beyond the immediate headlines, this development could reshape how the issue is handled.
On Sept. 30, Senate Democrats rejected the Stop Insider Trading Act after it had already passed the House with Democratic votes.
Compounding the significance of these events, if it had passed, the law would have barred members of Congress, their spouses and their dependent children from buying new stock in public companies even as in office.
It has also emerged that even more to the point: Democrats ran the Senate for years and never delivered the `` real'' ban on insider trading they now disingenuously purport to want.
Of particular significance is the fact that senate Democrats ’ latest vote against the Stop Insider Trading Act also puts attention back on Nancy Pelosi ’ s household, which sold 2,000 shares of Visa, worth between $ 500,000 and $ 1 million, on July 1, 2024.
Adding to the complexity of the situation, i might sum up the whole thing by saying: ‘ I ’ ve seen my opportunities and I took ‘ em. ’'' Today, Pelosi ’ s corruption is so obvious th
The Road Ahead
What is clear is that this story is not yet over. The coming days and weeks will likely bring additional developments — and additional clarity — on a situation that has already captured significant national attention.
💬 Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a Comment